Posts Tagged ‘Stephen King’

Stephen King Talks Shining Sequel

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Stephen King 2Stephen King is still out promoting his newest novel, Under the Dome, and I have to say that this tour has been pretty awesome so far. I haven’t seen King at any of his stops, or even read the book in question, but as the author keeps doing these promotional appearances, he keeps divulging exciting new tidbits of information on other projects. Earlier, he revealed a new Dark Tower novel, details on an Under the Dome miniseries, and gave us an update on his big screen version of Cell.

Each of those were big news, but they pale in comparison to his latest revelation: King has been mulling over writing a sequel to The Shining.

The Torontoist website offers up the following:

Then King dropped a fan bombshell on the crowd by casually describing a novel idea he began working on last summer. Seems King was wondering whatever happened to Danny Torrance of The Shining, who when readers last saw him was recovering from his ordeal at the Overlook Hotel at a resort in Maine with fellow survivors Wendy Torrance and chef Dick Halloran (who dies in the Kubrick film version). King remarked that though he ended his 1977 novel on a positive note, the Overlook was bound to have left young Danny with a lifetime’s worth of emotional scars. What Danny made of those traumatic experiences, and with the psychic powers that saved him from his father at the Overlook, is a question that King believes might make a damn fine sequel.

So what would a sequel to one of King’s most beloved novels look like? In King’s still tentative plan for the novel, Danny is now 40 years old and living in upstate New York, where he works as the equivalent of an orderly at a hospice for the terminally ill. Danny’s real job is to visit with patients who are just about to pass on to the other side, and to help them make that journey with the aid of his mysterious powers. Danny also has a sideline in betting on the horses, a trick he learned from his buddy Dick Hallorann.

The title for King’s proposed sequel? Doctor Sleep.

A sequel to The Shining would be pretty interesting, although I’m curious as to what the conflict would be in this new book. King burnt The Overlook hotel to the ground at the end of his novel, as I recall, so it seems like a sequel would have to go in an entirely different direction.






Spielberg Teaming With King to Take Us Under the Dome

Friday, November 20th, 2009

under-the-domeVariety brings us news today about that mini-series adaptation of Stephen King’s newest novel, Under the Dome, that I mentioned last week. Steven Spielberg’s Dreamworks TV has optioned the novel and hopes to release it on cable.

Spielberg won’t be directing, but he will be Executive Producing alongside King and Stacey Snider. The company has started to meet with potential writers for the project.

I’ll bring you more on this one as details slowly come into focus. In the meantime, if you’re like me you haven’t even cracked open this novel yet. Here’s what it’s about.

Under the Dome revolves around the drama that unfolds after an invisible force field suddenly descends on a small vacation town in Maine. As the locals fight for their survival, the town descends into warring factions led by enigmatic characters.

This isn’t the first time Spielberg and King have attempted to collaborate on a project. Spielberg has had an option on King’s The Talisman for over twenty years, but has never managed to bring the book to the silver or small screen. Let’s hope things go more smoothly with this adaptation.






Stephen King Mega Update

Friday, November 13th, 2009

It’s been a busy week for Stephen King news. His latest tome, Under the Dome, is now out (it’s massive–I probably won’t get around to reading it until next month), but there’s more good news for fans of horror’s most recognizable name. Read on for the details.

First up, King has revealed that Under the Dome is getting adapted for television. The book will be turned into a miniseries for HBO (which is a great choice, because it means nothing will have to be cut to appease the FCC). No word on when this will go into production or who’s involved, but I’ll keep you posted.

King also says that he’s finished the screenplay for the big-screen adaptation of his novel Cell. This was the project Eli Roth was attached to write and direct at one point, but then left.

And finally, perhaps the biggest news of all was this tidbit posted on King Super-Site Lilja’s Library:

“Stephen has given me permission to pass along that he has an idea for a new Dark Tower book, the working title of which will be THE WIND THROUGH THE KEYHOLE. He has not yet started this book and anticipates that it will be a minimum of eight months before he is able to begin writing it.”

“It will center around supporting characters and revolve around some important events between Wizard and Glass and Wolves of the Calla.”

Check out the clip below to hear more from the man himself.






Abrams and Lindelof Not Taking Us to The Dark Tower After All?

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Dark Tower

Fans looking forward to JJ Abrams’ cinematic adaptation of Stephen King’s The Dark Tower got some disappointing news last night. Abrams and partner Damon Lindelof announced back in May that they were seriously working on bringing the massive tale to a theater near you. Now, Lindelof tells USA Today that he’s backing away from the project.

“You’ll be hard-pressed to find a huger fan of The Dark Tower than me, but that’s probably the reason that I shouldn’t be the one to adapt it. After working six years on Lost, the last thing I want to do is spend the next seven years adapting one of my favorite books of all time. I’m such a massive Stephen King fan that I’m terrified of screwing it up.

Linedlof then adds I’d do anything to see those movies written by someone else. My guess is they will get made because they’re so incredible. But not by me.

Disappointing news for sure. The things cited as reasons not to do it are the very same reasons why these guys should be doing it. I’d rather have someone who loves the source material to death handling the adaptation than some dickhead gun-for-hire Hollywood director looking to make a name for himself.







Trailer and Synopsis for Stephen King’s Dolan’s Cadillac

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

I’ve never read Dolan’s Cadillac, but I guess I’ll have to at some point since the cinematic adaptation is looming on the horizon. Hopefully it’s better than From a Buick 8–which I finally gave up on after like 200 pages…

Anyway, the trailer and official synopsis for the film are now online–as are a bunch of new still photos. The trailer looks okay–I wasn’t knocked out of my seat by it, but it didn’t exactly give off the “oh my god this is gonna suck” vibe of The Mangler, either. I guess it’s good to see Christian Slater still working. Remember when this guy was going to be the next Nicholson?

This is the official synopsis for the film:

“Based on Stephen King’s eponymous short story, Dolan’s Cadillac is a dark tale of murderous and unrepentant revenge. A modern twist on the Edgar Allan Poe classic ‘The Cask of Amontillado,’ Dolan’s Cadillac proves that revenge really is a dish best served cold.

Robinson is a non-descript middle school teacher whose beloved wife, Elizabeth, witnesses an execution in the desert and becomes a target for the executioner, notorious Las Vegas crime boss Jimmy Dolan. Dolan’s vast wealth was accumulated through his human trafficking operation, a lucrative business he will not jeopardize.

The mobster succeeds in having Elizabeth killed before she can testify against him. Without a witness to the murders, Dolan goes free.

The Knowledge that Dolan is behind Elizabeth’s death fosters in Robinson an insatiable thirst for revenge. However, Dolan is virtually untouchable traveling only in his custom Cadillac with tank-like protection.

On a steep descent into madness, Robinson begins seeing visions of his dead wife wherever he goes. Spurred on by Elizabeth’s spectre, Robinson begins his elaborate plan to kill Jimmy Dolan.

The Cadillac that was once his armor may now become his tomb.

This is vengeance, Stephen King style.”







Abrams Almost Ready to Tackle The Dark Tower

Saturday, May 2nd, 2009

dark-tower

Last time I heard anything about the cinematic adaptation of Stephen King’s Dark Tower series was back in September of last year, when producer Damon Lindelof spoke vaguely of how he hoped the adaptation would go (basically saying that he wanted to make seven films–as long as enough people saw the first one to warrant making more).

Part of the hold up on the project has been the schedules of everyone involved. Lindelof is still working on Lost (which requires a lot of attention) and filmmaker JJ Abrams has been busy with a little film called Star Trek. Now that Trek is finally ready to go out into the world and stand on its own two feet, Abrams had this to say about the project when he recently spoke to IGN:

“Damon is obviously still on ‘Lost’ and we’ve been working on Star Trek together. As soon as ‘Lost’ is done, hopefully we’ll begin tackling that.” Abrams went on to say that they had been in touch with King–which seems like another positive sign.

No idea when this project will actually get off the ground, but Abrams is apparently penciling it in as his next piece, so one would assume that it’ll be sooner than later–and at this point, any news that this behemoth of an adaptation is still in the works is worth talking about.






It Remake to be Rated R?

Monday, April 6th, 2009

pennywise

Stephen King’s It is just one of the bazillion horror flicks set for a remake, but since the book is one of my favorite King novels (and arguably King’s last truly great book), I’m a little more interested in how the development process is going. Uncle Creepy over at Dread Central had a chance to chat with screenwriter Dave Kajganich, who’ll be handling the writing duties. Here’s what he had to say:

“The remake will be set in the mid-1980s and in the present almost equally — mirroring the twenty-odd-year gap King uses in the book — and with a *great* deal of care and attention paid to the backstories of all the characters,” says Kajganich. “I think the real twist here is that my pitch to WB — which they’ve assured me they’re on board for — is that this will not be PG-13. This will be R. Which means we can really honor the book and engage with the traumas (both the paranormal ones and those they deal with at home and school) that these character endure.”

“I plan to be very protective of the book,” Kajganich continues. “The reality, though, is that WB wants to do this as a single film, so I will have to kill a few darlings to make that happen. You have my promise, though, that I will do this with the utmost humility and respect for King’s work. He’s the King, after all, and I intend to continue to pledge to him my allegiance.”

I feel a little better after reading that. The story will retain the past/present motif of the novel and the original film (which was in doubt when I brought you news of this a month or so ago) and the R rating is fantastic news–no neutered Pennywise!

I’m still pretty worried about WB wanting to do it as a single film–It is a long book, and you’d have to kill more than “a few darlings” to make it fit into a traditional feature length film.

Expect more on the It remake as details emerge.






King’s It in Line for Remake

Friday, March 13th, 2009

pennywiseStphen King has had a pretty hit-and-miss run when it comes to adapting his books for the screen. For every The Dead Zone there’s a Graveyard Shift. In the case of The Shining there’s a Shining remake that should have never happened.

One of King’s more confounding films was It. Based on an 1100 page novel about a malevolent evil force feeding on the children of Derry, Maine, it seems incredible that the film version (presented as a two part mini-series) turned out as well as it did. In fact, the first two hours of It are pretty damn creepy (thanks in no small part to Tim Curry’s portrayal of Pennywise the Clown). It’s the second half (and a bad ending–which was inevitable because the ending of King’s novel was not only unfilmable but also pretty much nonsensical) that held the whole thing back.

Anyway, yesterday’s Hollywood Reporter has a story about a planned remake of the film. Warner Bros. is partnering with Lin Pictures and Vertigo Entertainment for a big screen re-interpretation of the classic novel. If you’ve been paying attention, this should fill you with dread–a four hour miniseries couldn’t really recreate the story from an 1100 page book, so how exactly is a shorter film going to do the source material justice?

The obvious answer is by changing the story. Warners has hired screenwriter Dave Kajganich to write the new version and changes are already afoot. The original novel bounced around between 1958 and 1985, but early buzz is that the remake will be set in the present only. How will this work? Your guess is as good as mine. Will we get a story of the youngsters killing It and sending it back into another cycle of dormancy or will we only follow the adults, called back to Derry to end it once and for all? I’m guessing it will be the latter, which sucks because most of what makes It so interesting is watching these kids (who’re an assortment of outcasts) take on a terrifying monster as old as the universe itself.

Details are scarce at this point, but keep it here for more updates as they become available.






Stephen King Discusses Twilight

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

stephen-king

You know if a story about Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight series turns up on this site, it’s only so I can make fun of it.

USA Weekend got none other than Stephen King himself to weigh in on Meyer and her books. To say that King doesn’t really seem to be a fan becomes brutally apparent after his comments.

Both [J.K.] Rowling and Meyer, they’re speaking directly to young people… The real difference is that Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn. She’s not very good.”

And there you have it–yet another voice added to the chorus. I wonder how Meyer feels after reading that? She probably doesn’t care–she’s still got more money than any of us. Aspiring writers take note–you can suck and still become a New York Times bestselling author.






Brian Keene’s Top Ten Books of 2008

Thursday, November 27th, 2008

First off, Happy Thanksgiving. I took yesterday off from posting stuff (in case you didn’t notice the lack of updates) and I’m taking today off too. However, I wanted to pass along one thing for those of you who swing by–taking two days off made me feel oddly guilty.

One of my favorite annual lists is out–Brian Keene’s Top 10 Books of the Year. I read enough books to do a top 10 list of my own, but the problem is that I don’t read enough stuff from any given year to do it in the way Keene does it. I’m always late getting to books, so I’ll read something that came out in 2006 in 2008 or something like that, which makes the list sort of pointless. Brian is way more on the ball than I am.

I’ve not read everything on his list (I have read Severance Package and I’m about halfway done with Just After Sunset. I’ve got Lansdale’s latest in my pile, and I will be finding the David J. Schow book mentioned posthaste), but that’s the joy of the list for me–every year Keene manages to point out at least five things I either missed or was on the fence about. Hopefully some of you find it equally useful.

So, click here and check out what “The Zombie Guy” thought were the ten best books of 2008.